When I tell people I’m a photographer, they frequently ask about my “style” of photography. This used to be a really easy question for me to answer – landscape. I took this photo of a stand of trees dusted with snow almost 20 years ago with my old Minolta. It’s one of only a handful of film images I deemed worthy of scanning. The original is color, but it works better in black and white, so I desaturated the scanned copy. It’s still one of my all-time favorite images.
This classic shot of autumn trees reflected in a pond was taken 6 years ago, a little more than a year after I switched to digital. These types of images dominated my photographic style for the 20+ years I used film. Most people call them postcard photos. They mean this in a complimentary way – they are the type of photos that most people want to be able to take. Nicely composed, exposed correctly, in focus and “pretty.” I have taken thousands of photos of like this, it’s something I can almost do on autopilot now.
This reflex comes in pretty handy when I’m on vacation, I always come back with lots of great photos that make entertaining slide shows. It impresses people. But over the last few years it’s become sort of boring. So I’ve been trying to evolve my “style,” for lack of a better word. If you look at the photos in the “Random” folder on my website photo album, you’ll get some sense of what I mean. I also have a few sprinkled in with the conventional travel photos. My husband likes to say that my favorite photo from any given trip is the one that looks like it could have been taken anywhere. An old bike leaning against a building in Amsterdam, for example. I think it’s because the photo with the recognizable icon (like a windmill) is always tinged by the postcard or snapshot feeling, no matter how good it is.
This doesn’t mean I’ll stop taking the postcard shots. Just that I’ll keep trying to go beyond them.